*FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In Historical Criticism of the Bible Eta Linnemann tells how modern Bible scholarship has drifted far from the truth. In this first English language edition, author Eta Linnemann challenges the root assumption of this theology, its claim to be “scientific.” To the contrary, she finds. Linnemann, Eta () “Historical-Critical and Evangelical Theology,” Journal of the Adventist Theological Society: Vol. 5: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at.
|Published (Last):||15 February 2012|
|PDF File Size:||19.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In her book “What is credible – the Bible or the Bible criticism” Linnemann claimed inciting an unnamed ear witness, that Rudolf Bultmann on his death bed had recanted his critical views.
I heard about Eta Linnemann for the first time today while listening to this video lecture at a Bible Seminary starting at This page was last edited on 5 Augustat My destructive addictions were replaced by a hunger and thirst for his Word and for fellowship with Christians. Linnemann rejected Markan priority and favored the Independence View of the synoptic gospels. For those who know German, you can also find several lectures by Linnemann on various topics on YouTube.
stylos: Eta Linnemann’s rejection of the Historical-Critical Method
Still, her critique of historical-critical methodology is invaluable. One of my pet projects this year has been reviewing and studying linnemabn rise of the historical-critical method in Biblical studies in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Her life changed linneman The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Hanover commissioned Linnemann to write interpretations of biblical texts for religious education. You can read also read online a transcript of a testimony Linneman gave in at a California church and a scholarly article by Robert W.
Linnemann should be read with discernment given that ega apparently became involved with a charismatic, non-confessional church group. In her last years, she broke completely with the theology of her teacher Rudolf Bultmann.
Historical Criticism of the Bible: Thomas Three views on the origins of the Synoptic Gospelsp. Retrieved from ” https: At first, however, what Linnsmann realized led me into profound disillusionment.
Between and she taught at the seminar for church service in Berlin-Zehlendorfin she was appointed as Visiting Professor at Braunschweig University of Technology. I’ll be sure to read more about Eta in days to come. This interests me as I have studied much of the history of German Higher criticism and am astounded and even over joyed that someone could come out of that fold and become a true believer.
This led her to an unswerving commitment to the inspiration and authority of Scripture: I reacted by linjemann toward addictions which might dull my misery.
One of Linnemann’s views to find support among conservative English speaking scholarship, notably F.
This lihnemann first appeared in German as Wissenschaft oder Meinung? Views Read Edit View history. Though it appears Linnemann died before turning her attention to a critique of modern text and translation criticism, one wonders what conclusions she might have reached.
I regard everything linnemannn I taught and wrote before I entrusted my life to Jesus as refuse. Her scholarship stands on it’s own foundation despite her own personal, idiosyncratic rejection of it. Thanks for posting this.
Eta Linnemann (Author of Historical Criticism of the Bible)
In the Introduction to the critique, Linnemann reviews some of her testimony, including how she began to be disillusioned by the historical-critical method and its skeptical approach to Scripture and faith. I became enslaved to watching television and fell into an increasing state of alcohol dependence p.
Linnemann’s book on the linnemahn is outstanding. David Farnellwas her rejection of a Q source for the synoptic Gospels in favour of an explanation following the Jewish requirement of Deuteronomy